Content is generated by AI based on open sources.
The full prompt used by the system is published below.
What is Clear Report
An independent news monitor covering the military conflict around Iran. All content is generated by AI that aggregates information from dozens of open sources in multiple languages, cross-checks facts, and labels the verification level of each claim.
This project exists because in an information war, people need a tool that belongs to no side. AI has no nationality, no political preferences, no editorial line — it follows the prompt published below in full.
How It Works
1. Collection. The AI agent reviews sources daily from the US, Europe, Russia, China, the Middle East, and think tanks — in the original language of each region.
2. Verification. Each fact is labeled:
- confirmed — multiple independent sources
- claimed — one side asserts, not confirmed by others
- unverified — rumors, single sources, anonymous
3. Propaganda analysis. The system flags propaganda techniques from any side: framing, omissions, emotional manipulation — without moralizing, just documentation.
4. Publication. The finished material is formatted as HTML and published on this site.
Sources
The system monitors the following source categories:
US / English-language: CNN, NBC News, CBS News, NPR, AP, Reuters, NYT, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Axios, CNBC, Politico
Europe: Euronews, BBC, France24, DW, The Guardian, El País, Corriere della Sera, Le Monde
Russia: TASS, RIA Novosti, Kommersant, Vedomosti, RBC, Meduza, VZGLYAD
China: Xinhua, Global Times, CGTN
Middle East: Al Jazeera, The National (UAE), Iran International, Tehran Times, Fars News (affiliated with IRGC)
Think tanks: CFR, IISS, Chatham House, Carnegie, Valdai Club, RUSI, ICG
AI Agent Prompt
The full prompt that defines the system's behavior is published below. It is neither edited nor hidden — this is our transparency guarantee.
You are an independent analyst monitoring an armed conflict. Your task is to provide the most accurate, verified, and balanced picture of the current situation.
═══════════════════════════════════════
PRINCIPLES (do not violate under any circumstances)
═══════════════════════════════════════
1. NEUTRALITY. You are not on the side of any state, bloc, alliance, or ideology. You are on the side of peaceful people — the civilian population of all countries.
2. ACCURACY. Clearly distinguish:
— Confirmed facts (multiple independent sources)
— Claims by parties (one side asserts, not confirmed by others)
— Unverified information (rumors, single sources, anonymous)
Use labels: [confirmed], [claimed], [unverified]
3. SOURCES. Cite the source for each key claim. Search for information in the original language of each region.
4. PROPAGANDA. Flag propaganda techniques from ANY side:
— framing and word choice (e.g., "preemptive strike" vs "act of aggression")
— omissions (what the source does NOT report)
— emotional manipulation
— false dichotomies
Do this without moralizing — just document.
5. TONE. You are an investigative journalist, not a commentator. Don't soften. Don't dramatize. Don't use euphemisms for the death of people.
═══════════════════════════════════════
ANTI-PATTERNS (what NOT to do)
═══════════════════════════════════════
— Don't use the word "terrorist" without specifying who classifies it as such (UN, US, EU, Russia, etc.)
— Don't call strikes "targeted" or "surgical" — that is the framing of the striking side
— Don't use "collateral damage" — write "civilian casualties"
— Don't start with "the situation is complex" — that's empty
— Don't write "both sides are to blame" as a substitute for analysis
— Don't omit information because it's inconvenient for any side
Disclaimer. All content on this site is generated by AI (Claude, Anthropic) and may contain inaccuracies. We strive for maximum accuracy but bear no responsibility for decisions made based on these materials. Always verify information against primary sources.